The incidence of lymphoma in first-degree relatives of patients with Hodgkin disease and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: results and limitations of a registry-linked study.

BACKGROUND: The precise incidence of familial Hodgkin disease (HD) and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in first-degree relatives is unknown. Through record linkage using two population-based sources, the authors estimated the risk of HD and NHL in family members of lymphoma probands. METHODS: The authors identified 8,037 first-degree relatives of 2,606 lymphoma cases (28.5% HD, 71.5% NHL) treated between 1970 and 1993 in 3 hospitals in Israel via the family file of the Population Registry. The authors linked this file with the Israel Cancer Registry, then calculated the standardized incidence ratio (SIR) by dividing the observed number of cases with the expected, adjusting for age, gender, calendar year, and continent of origin. RESULTS: The family file yielded incomplete ascertainment of relatives (for 771 probands, no relatives were identified). Twenty cases of lymphoma--6 HD and 14 NHL--were identified among relatives of lymphoma patients. The SIR for HD was 1.15 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.42-2.51) and for NHL 1.71 (95% CI: 0.93-2.87), considering the entire population of first-degree relatives. SIRs among siblings of lymphoma probands were 3.12 (95% CI: 1.01-7.29) for HD, 2.16 (95% CI: 0.45-6.31) for NHL, and 2.68 (95% CI: 1.15-5.27) for all lymphomas. There were 4 HD/HD, 1 NHL/NHL, and 3 NHL/HD sibling pairs. For HD/HD and NHL/NHL sibling pairs, the interval between lymphoma occurrence in proband and sibling was 1-4 years, whereas for HD/NHL pairs this ranged from 16 to 21 years. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of lymphoma among siblings of lymphoma probands was over 2.5-fold that of the general population and lower among other family members. The temporal proximity of HD/HD and NHL/NHL sibling pairs argues for environmental as well as genetic etiology. This method was hampered by incomplete data.

Cost-benefit analysis of a national thalassaemia prevention programme in Israel.

OBJECTIVE: In Israel (population 5.7 million) there are around 200 known living subjects with thalassaemia major, of whom around 80% are from the northern district. This study aims at examining the costs and benefits of a national screening programme to prevent thalassaemia in Israel. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The lifetime healthcare costs of caring for a person born with thalassaemia major are $284,154. The costs of the home infusion service (33.1%) actually exceed the costs of the chelating agent itself (22.1%). The remaining 44.8% of costs are due to stay in hospital, operations, outpatient visits, laboratory tests, therapists, etc. Lost earnings and premature mortality costs account for a further $51,843 and $141,944 respectively for each case. A national screening programme would cost $900,197 and prevent around 13.4 homozygotes being born, at a cost of $67,369 for each birth prevented. The benefit-cost ratio of the programme to the health services is 4.22:1, which increases to 6.01:1 when a societal perspective is taken. However, around 13.0 homozygote births are still expected to occur, the majority owing to lack of compliance of patients at various stages in the screening process. The addition of a national health education programme for the higher risk non-Jewish population either nationally or in selected regions will incur extra costs, which may be covered by increased benefits as a result of better compliance with the screening programme. CONCLUSION: Israel should start to provide a nationwide thalassaemia screening programme as the monetary benefits to society (and even to the health services alone) will exceed the screening programmes costs.